A Discovery of Witches by Deborah Harkness

Discovery_of_Witches_Cover2010. Penguin. ebook. 581 pages.

In a nutshell:

Scholar Diana Bishop is a witch who largely refuses to use her powers – except for special occasions, such as when her washing machine is broken or a book is out of reach. While conducting research in Oxford’s Bodliean Library, Diana comes across a spell-bound book and has a brief magical interaction with it before returning it to the stacks. This action brings her to the attention of all the supernatural creatures in the vicinity: the other witches, daemons, and vampires. One vampire in particular, Matthew Clairmont, seeks her out and the two fall in love. This taboo relationship and Diana’s burgeoning powers throw both of them into danger, as they journey to Clairmont’s ancestral home in France and then to Diana’s home in upstate New York.

Review:

If I were to compare A Discovery of Witches to another book, it would be Elizabeth Kostova’s The Historian. The two books share a combination of vampires, history and travel, not to mention lengthiness. I remember loving Kostova’s novel, especially her ability to evoke the way places were in certain times. A Discovery of Witches does not have as good a sense of place, except for Harkness’ depiction of the old haunted house in upstate New York. I loved that house with all its quirks and ghosts. Harkness gave the upstate New York locale a New England feel, and I certainly warmed to that. Indeed, the last third may have been my favorite part of the book, as more and more characters show up at the house, including one of my favorite side characters, Miriam. True, the last third also could get boggy as supernatural politics and rules are stuffed in alongside eleventh-hour hurried explanations – [**Spoiler**] oh Diana you have all the powers because you absorbed your twin in utero! okay go time travel now! [**/end spoiler**].

Why am I starting this review by describing the last third? Well, I wanted to start with the positive, I guess. I debated giving up on this book while in the first two-thirds because I hated the Matthew / Diana dynamic so much. Young “special” woman courted by very old vampire? Oh, and he’s stalkerish (“over-protective”), handsome and rich too? Yippee. The first part – in Oxford – was almost insufferable, as Matthew shows off his antiques and fine wines to Diana, whisking her around in his high-end car and to his high-end estate. And he’s also – wait for it – dangerous, so there’s that tired rigmarole as well.

The section in France is a little improved, as we are introduced to Matthew’s mom, Ysabeau, also a cool side character. But it’s also: more antiques! More displays of Matthew’s fine tastes! And it was in this section that I realized that the book features lots of scenes of Diana being told to rest. Usually this is for a good reason, as she experiences a lot of emotional and physical trauma during the book. But she is constantly submitting to the caretaking and ministrations of others, and this gets repetitive. As lengthy as this book is, as a reader, you start to eye those repetitive aspects and ask if all that was really necessary.

I’m semi-curious about the rest of the trilogy, as I did like aspects of the book. Despite the clumsy way it was sometimes handled or written, the supernatural politics and world-building had some intrigue. And the side characters had promise – more airtime for them could possibly benefit the story as a whole, I think. Has anyone read the whole trilogy? Does it get better?

Excerpts from others’ reviews:

Iris on Books – “Throughout the first half, reading A Discovery of Witches felt like an addictive rush, I kept on wanting to read more, and I could not wait to recommend it to the people I know who enjoy paranormal fiction. However, towards the end of the book, that rush turned into a mixture of the will to keep reading and dread combined with, at times, annoyance.”

The Literary Omnivore – “The plot structure is crippled by the lack of any resolution in this installment of the trilogy, the overbearing romance is so syrupy you’ll want to wash your hands, and the worldbuilding’s motto appears to be “Why show when you can tell”? Definitely a miss.”

Tif Talks Books – “I loved the complexities added in, including alchemic history, suspenseful mysteries, intricate connections, scientific relations to the paranormal, and more than a little romance.”

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The Spiral Staircase by Karen Armstrong

Spiral Staircase

The Spiral Staircase: My Climb Out of Darkness

2003. Knopf. Hardcover. 336 pages.

Review:

Two years ago, I read Karen Armstrong’s Twelve Steps to a Compassionate Life as part of an interfaith book discussion. Although I’m aware of Armstrong’s impressive bibliography of books on the major world religions, I have not yet read any of them. Twelve Steps was recently published and is kind of the book incarnation of Armstrong’s work toward a global compassion movement. The Spiral Staircase is Armstrong’s memoir that starts from her departure from the convent to the time of the memoir’s writing (it was published in 2003). There also exists a memoir about her time in the convent called Through the Narrow Gate, and I was surprised to learn from The Spiral Staircase, that Armstrong had published a memoir about her post-convent life before, in 1983, under the title Beginning the World. She seems to disavow the 1983 version of her story now.

The title of the book is a reference to T.S. Eliot’s poem, “Ash Wednesday”. The first part of the poem prefaces The Spiral Staircase: “Because I do not hope to turn again / Because I do not hope / Because I do not hope to turn . . .” The poem and the title evoke a gradual climb that doesn’t always feel like progress.

For those who, like me, didn’t read her first memoir, Through the Narrow Gate, Armstrong provides enough background to understand how life in the convent damaged her. The Spiral Staircase begins with Armstrong as a student in Oxford, unable to emotionally connect to art and slowly giving up on God, whose presence had always eluded her. She has a formidable intellect, but still struggles to find her place in academia. Disappointment after disappointment seem to dog her life, though friends and her landlord’s family provide bright spots that pierce through her internal darkness. Armstrong’s voice in The Spiral Staircase is very frank but also generous toward her past self and toward others.

One of the most heartbreaking aspects to Armstrong’s story is her long-undiagnosed epilepsy. During her life in the convent, Armstrong experienced several attacks that looked like fainting to others’ eyes. Her superiors accused her of being dramatic. Outside of the convent, her episodes – which often included hallucinations, disorientation, terror and sometimes amnesia – became even more frightening. Psychiatrists thought it was mental illness and addressed it accordingly, and of course this failed to actually help her. When she was finally diagnosed, the doctor expressed exasperation at how all these psychiatrists failed to recognize her textbook case of epilepsy. Even today, Armstrong writes, there are some people in her life who refuse to accept that her epilepsy is a medical problem, not a mental illness.

The memoir grows brighter and brighter as Karen describes discovering her passion for comparative religion. She travels to Jerusalem as part of a TV production, and also learns more about Islam and Judaism while looking again at Christianity. It’s a pleasure to read of someone finding their calling, and even better, reading Armstrong’s insightful analysis and enthusiasm for her topic. I copied out two quotes, one of which I included in my end-of-year blog post, but which I’ll quote again (I also enjoy the allusion to Lewis Carroll):

Religion is not about accepting twenty impossible propositions before breakfast, but about doing things that change you.

And the second quote:

Faith was really the cultivation of a conviction that life had some ultimate meaning and value, despite the tragic evidence to the contrary.

The Spiral Staircase was a difficult read at first, because her life was difficult then, but I think that is necessary in order to feel the joy as Karen finds her place in the world. I’m glad to have read this memoir before diving into her backlist, as I think it will add to the reading experience to know how she came to be interested in writing about the world religions.

Excerpts from others’ reviews:

The Book Brothel – “Armstrong does a great job of expressing a lot of strong emotions in a way that feels honest and not overboard. Her unorthodox life makes for a very interesting autobiography, bringing together faith, religion, illness, and the academic world in a look at the 1960s and 1970s, a period of time that was turning away from Armstrong’s original beliefs.”

Shelf Love (Teresa) – “It’s a beautiful story that shows the value of always seeking, even when the answers seem hidden in the darkness.”

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Mini-reviews: Smile, A Woman Entangled, and Ocean at the End of the Lane

Smile Telgemeier  Smile by Raina Telgemeier

2009. GRAPHIX. Paperback. 214 pages.

Review: This delightful graphic novel is a coming-of-age memoir aimed at a young-adult audience, but definitely enjoyable for adults. Raina Telgemeier depicts the story of her junior-high and high school years, which start inauspiciously with an accident that damages her two front teeth. Various dental surgeries and procedures become the throughline for her tale of teenaged life. The specifics of Telgemeier’s life touch on common, recognizable ground: the crushes, the frenemies, the discovered interests. My teenaged life was about a decade later than Raina’s, and was even more devoid of boys than hers, but oh, I definitely identified with the fear of embarrassment and being a teenaged observer to a natural disaster (hers a devastating earthquake, mine a much-less-devastating, but still powerful ice-storm). My absolutely favorite part of Smile was when Raina switches from one group of friends to a new group of friends: Telgemeier takes a moment to acknowledge that the old friends didn’t transform into sworn enemies, but rather morphed into friendly acquaintances.

Excerpts from others’ reviews:

13-year-old daughter of Average Girl Reads - “What I liked: it was in color; she was about my age for most of the book; it showed what braces are really like when you first get them; she does the right thing; there was comedy. What I didn’t like: the setting was before my time, so I was confused about some fads and fashion; it ended so soon! >=(” [This quote was changed from bullet point to paragraph form for better fit for my blog – Christy]

Beth Fish Reads – “This graphic novel autobiography is so honestly told that I can’t imagine anyone who wouldn’t love it.”

The Blue Bookcase – “The character’s expressions are absolutely fantastic and the teenage world of San Francisco in the late 80’s and early 90’s is created well. The craftsmanship is excellent.

Woman Entangled  A Woman Entangled by Cecilia Grant

2013. Bantam. ebook. 336 pages.

Review: This is the second book I’ve read by historical romance author Cecilia Grant, and the third in a series (I read the first in the series.) In this book, Kate Westbrook is intent on improving her family’s lot by reconnecting with her father’s estranged family and marrying well. Family friend Nick Blackshear was once in love with Kate, but now has other things on his mind, principally the negative effect his brother’s marriage has had on his law career. I appreciate how Grant’s world shows the consequences of “unacceptable” marriages (as decided by society) and that there is no magic resolution for some situations. I like how Kate and Nick are flawed but likable, and that the story isn’t only about their developing relationship, but also about their relationships with their family and friends. The historical backdrop is much more smoothly integrated in A Woman Entangled than it was in Grant’s good, but sometimes dragging, A Lady Awakened. I would recommend this for fans of Courtney Milan. They do not have exactly the same style, but some of the same sensibilities.

Excerpts from others’ reviews:

Dear Author – “A Woman Entangled did finish much stronger than it started, making it a worthwhile read, if still a slightly disappointing one.”

Jenny’s Books – “My point is, I like it that the characters aren’t consistently right or wrong by virtue of serving as protagonists or antagonists.”

ocean at the end of the lane  The Ocean at the End of the Lane by Neil Gaiman

2013. William Morrow. ebook. 246 pages.

Review: I don’t love Neil Gaiman’s books. I’ve read two others besides this one: Neverwhere which I disliked, and Stardust which I liked but didn’t leave much of an impression. I added myself to the library’s waitlist for this ebook because The Ocean at the End of the Lane had been near omnipresent for a while on my blog feed. It’s a fairly simple tale, with some interesting fantasy details. But as I’m writing this, I’m kind of wondering what else to say. I mean, the book is not without some quietly powerful moments, such as when the main character – a young boy – stands up to his father. And everything about the farm is warmly inviting. I liked the bittersweet tone of the book overall. But it’s just not a very memorable book for me.

Excerpts from others’ reviews:

bookshelves of doom – “If the books of Ray Bradbury had an affair with the books of Diana Wynne Jones, the resulting lovechild would very probably look something like The Ocean at the End of the Lane.”

Shelf Love (Jenny) – “[Gaiman] lets us see the strong places, too, and the love, and the comfort, whenever there is any, and the eventual possibility of healing. I’d say this book — like all true art — is bigger on the inside than on the outside.”

The Wertzone – “It’s almost like Gaiman wanted to write a moody piece about childhood but then decided he needed some sort of existential threat to be introduced and defeated because, well, it’s a fantasy novel.”

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The Bone Clocks by David Mitchell

Bone Clocks2014. Random House. ebook. 640 pages.

Review:

In a spasmodic wish to be “current” with my reading, I placed myself on the waitlist for The Bone Clocks ebook through my public library. I knew very little about the novel going in, except that there were multiple narrators like Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas (which I haven’t read), and that the first narrator was a teenage British girl.

That teenaged British girl is Holly Sykes, who has just decided to go live with her much older boyfriend, only to find he’s (no surprise) cheating on her with another underage girl. So she runs away from her town into the countryside. This first section is a masterpiece of first-person narration: Holly’s voice comes through with an indelible, clear personality and with a natural cadence.

If you’ve heard anything about The Bone Clocks, you probably know that it has a sci-fi / fantasy element. This first Holly section has a strong blast of this element: it’s disorienting and suspenseful in execution.

After the first section ended, I was sorry to leave Holly’s point of view and jump into the mind of sociopathic Hugo Lamb (who is apparently a character from a previous Mitchell book). As soon as I got a taste of Lamb’s narration, I was like, “Who is this jerk? Take me back to Holly.” But I soon succumbed to the brilliance of Mitchell’s writing in this section as well, as he captures the milieu of Cambridge and gradually reveals the extent of Lamb’s manipulations. Lamb crosses paths with Holly and it turns out that Holly is the main thread that runs through the novel, growing older through others’ eyes.

Lamb’s section is followed by two more male narrators: a weary war correspondent in 2003, and a misanthropic author who hails from in and around our present day. I found the 2003 section to be moderately tiresome, as the war journalist is prodded to talk about his Iraq experiences by oblivious, obnoxious members of a wedding party. It felt like the author’s views had too strong a presence, overtaking the story at times. The fourth section – with the misanthropic author – is a globe-trotting segment; it took me a while to warm up to this narrator but I eventually did. Throughout the second through fourth sections, the sci-fi / fantasy element blinks in and out, present though not as prolonged as in Holly’s first section.

It is in the fifth section that the sci-fi / fantasy element is thoroughly indulged and explained. I saw that a lot of readers hated this section, and I agree that it is the weakest part of the book. I don’t want to give away all of the book’s secrets, but suffice to say, the story involves two groups of immortal people – some who achieve it through humane, natural ways and some who achieve it through incredibly evil means. The narrator of the fifth section is one of the “good” immortals, whose soul jumps through the ages. I found this concept fascinating. The story of how the narrator found himself in the body of a young Russian peasant girl in the 19th century and had to make his way out of serfdom was compelling.

Unfortunately, the fifth section is also full of exposition, a made-up vocabulary, and a drawn-out supernatural fight scene. I tend to find many fight scenes boring, both in movies and books. I especially have trouble when the combatants have superhuman powers, as they do in Bone Clocks‘ climactic battle. It’s a lot of people throwing each other around using their minds and special hand gestures. I was glad when it was over.

The final section returns us to Holly again, now a grandmother living in a bleak world that is falling into apocalypse. I agree with others that it gets a little preachy here, as characters outline the causes of why the world is collapsing. But, at the same time, aspects felt scarily plausible, and I was heavily invested in the fates of Holly, her family and her neighbors. I could have done without the caricature of the female religious fundamentalist, who comes complete with a loutish, leering son – especially in a book where the sociopath can have a nuanced portrayal and redemptive moment. I find it telling when there is a pattern of who present-day novelists are humanizing and who they are caricaturing. If it’s the same “types” that are getting caricatured over and over, then it starts to veer from interesting critique to dehumanization of a certain group of people.

Anyway, despite that annoyance, I really did like the last chapter a lot, and shed some tears at the end. It’s an ambitious novel, as many other reviewers have said, and perhaps a little messy, but worthwhile. I love the title: “bone clocks” is an evocative metaphor of the ordinary human life, of Holly’s life which is a finite, wondrous thing set in counterpoint to the immortals whose battles and intrigues swirl around her.

Excerpts from others’ reviews:

Fantasy Book Critic – “Overall, The Bone Clocks is very ambitious and has enough goodies to be a very good book and worth reading, but not the best David Mitchell – especially if it’s not the first novel of the author one reads as the amazing voice versatility is not as astonishing any more – and quite far from the admittedly humongous expectations I had about it.”

S. Krishna’s Books – “When I was at about 500 pages in and there were still almost 150 pages left, I couldn’t help but be in disbelief that I was still reading it. I suppose it’s a warning that this book can seem like a slog at times (but most of the times it moves along well), but it’s worth persevering through those because it really is such a well told book.”

The Speculative Scotsman – ” . . . not all of The Bone Clocks‘ narrators are pleasant people, but they read as real—as do the worlds they inhabit, whether these worlds once were or are the stuff of science fiction—and that’s what matters.”

10 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Left to Tell by Immaculee Ilibigiza

Left To Tell

Left to Tell: Discovering God Amidst the Rwandan Holocaust by Immaculee Ilibagiza with Steve Erwin

2006. Hay House. ebook. 215 pages.

Summary:

Immaculee Ilibagiza was a college student, home for the Easter holidays, at the time of the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Along with seven other women, she survived the slaughter by hiding in a tiny, second bathroom of a pastor’s house, for three months. The rest of her immediate family – except for a brother who lived in Senegal – were killed. In Left to Tell, Immaculee briefly describes her family and childhood before giving an account of her experience of the genocide.

Review:

As the subtitle indicates, Immaculee Ilibagiza’s story of her survival is also a story of her faith. A devout Catholic, Immaculee’s description of her time hiding in the bathroom focuses mainly on her spiritual struggle. The eight hiding women spent most of the three months in complete silence, with a small high window that let in the sound of the killing and the killers’ boasts. In this dread quiet, Immaculee prayed and meditated on Bible verses that gave her strength, while persistent voices in her head told her that she would surely die. As a reader, I saw it as a pitched battle between hope and despair.

Immaculee credits God with sparing her life; the book describes many close calls averted by the prayers of Immaculee and her companions. In one instance described in the book, the Interhamwe searched the pastor’s house, looking for Immaculee in particular. (This is the horror of neighbors killing neighbors: they remembered that they had found and killed all of her family except for her.) As the women listened in fear to the sounds of the killers on the other side of the bathroom door, Immaculee prayed and had an out-of-body vision of Jesus and the cross:

Then Jesus spoke: “Mountains are moved with faith, Immaculee, but if faith were easy, all the mountains would be gone. Trust in me, and know that I will never leave you. Trust in me, and have no more fear. Trust in me, and I will save you. I shall put my cross upon this door, and they will not reach you. Trust in me, and you shall live.”

Suddenly I was back on the floor again with the others. Their eyes were still closed, but mine were wide open, staring at a giant cross of brilliant white light stretching from wall to wall in front of the bathroom door. As I looked, radiant energy brushed my face, warming my skin like the sun. I knew instinctively that a kind of Divine force was emanating from the cross, which would repel the killers. I knew that we were protected and safe, so I jumped to my feet, feeling like I had the strength of a lioness.

[p. 131 in the hardcover edition]

Her survival is indeed incredible and this is her story to tell as she experienced it. Even so, though I share the author’s Christian faith, I felt uncomfortable with the implication that if she had not trusted in Jesus then she would have died. To be clear, Immaculee does not seem to equate strong faith with guaranteed survival. Immaculee’s family were also devout. A witness to her brother Damascene’s death tells Immaculee that some of his last words were: “Today is my day to go to God.” But I can’t help thinking that such portrayals of faith – accepting martyrs, survivors of mighty faith – can unintentionally open the door to judgment on those who felt no such certainty or acceptance about their fate.

I want to be careful here, though, because I want to leave room for the varied experiences of faith. My worldview is not the same as Immaculee’s worldview, and I want to respect that. I definitely see how Immaculee’s faith kept her soul and mind intact through this horrific ordeal and the loss of her family, friends, and home. By fighting and scrapping for hope, she kept herself alive on the inside. She was able to make space in her mind to think of the future. While hiding in the bathroom, she asked the pastor to bring her books in English so she could try to learn that language. After the Rwandan Patriotic Front took back Kigali, she persistently tried for a job with the UN personnel who were stationed there and eventually was successful. And most miraculously, she found that she could forgive her family’s killers.

When I heard Immaculee Ilibagiza speak at the National Book Festival years ago, her main emphasis was on forgiveness. In the book, she describes how she temporarily took care of two orphaned boys while they were staying in the French camp.

I saw the circle of hatred and mistrust forming in those innocent eyes . . . I vowed that one day, when I was strong and capable enough, I would do everything I could to help the children orphaned by the genocide. I would try to bring hope and happiness to their lives, and to steer them away from embracing the hatred that had robbed them of their parents, and of a family’s love.

[p. 165 in the hardcover edition]

With hope alive inside of her, Immaculee was able to look beyond herself and see the larger picture and how forgiveness was the harder, but better way.

Before I conclude, I want to add a short note about the pastor who shelters Immaculee. In the book, he is portrayed as a man clearly acting on moral principle but who constantly seems on the precipice of cowardice, and who isn’t entirely immune to the hateful rhetoric that has galvanized many of the Rwandan populace. Though he saved the lives of these eight women, he sent Immaculee’s brother and a family friend out of the house, where they were later murdered. He also turned away an old widow who came looking for shelter. What to think about such a man? This is still on my mind.

I’m glad I finally read this book after hearing Immaculee speak so many years ago. Sadly and shamefully, genocides and war still claim lives today. I think of the recent slaughter in Nigeria and the over 200,000 dead due to the Syrian war. I think of the survivors and refugees and all the different ways that humans manage to keep going despite the forces of hate and cruelty that surround them. Those lives and books like Left to Tell are a testament to resilience but also an indictment.

Excerpts from others’ reviews:

Book Addiction – “The book goes into a little detail about why the genocide in Rwanda occured; it’s pretty rudimentary but it will suffice if you are not informed of the causes already (of course, I encourage anyone to read up on the genocide who is not familiar with what happened anyway).” [Christy’s note: I strongly recommend We Wish to Inform You … by Philip Gourevitch]

Embejo Etc – “This is a great book to read if you want to see what the world is like outside of our sphere, to be brought to a horrible reality of the evil capabilities of men and women, and to be inspired in a faith that sees hope even in the darkest situation.”

Pages Unbound – “Left to Tell is powerful, in more ways than one.  Ilibagiza gives numbers and images that illustrate the magnitude of the Rwandan holocaust, but by focusing on her own story she allows readers to experience the event in a more personal way.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

2014 End of Year bookish thoughts and survey

And so, another year has come to a close. As a reading year, 2014 was at first dominated by one book, which also happens to be the best and longest book I read last year. It is named in the below survey. Loved the book, wish it hadn’t taken me so long to read it. I also read a lot of romance novels this year, some very good, as well as some awful, unfinishable ones. Speaking of bad books, a couple of co-workers and I happily MST3K’d two terrible books this year, using post-it notes and annotations in the margins.

I also finished a self-imposed project to read eight books written by authors who were at the National Book Festival in previous years. I’m glad that I followed through, as it added a nice mix of genres to my reading year. That said, 2014 ended with me feeling like I hadn’t read many books – a feeling perhaps due to the domination of several very long books. The long books often end up being the books I like best, but next year, I want to try to reach at least 75 books. I also hope to read more classics next year.

To further summarize my 2014 year-in-reading, I am borrowing the survey created by Perpetual Page Turner, with some modifications: I took out some questions if the answers seemed repetitive or boring. I also added a couple of questions of my own. I kept the numbering of the original survey, so it’s going to look wonky because I removed some questions.

Here goes:

Number Of Books You Read: 59
Number of Re-Reads: 1

 

  1. Best Book You Read In 2014?

Parting the Waters: Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement 1954 – 63 by Taylor Branch

  1. Book You Were Excited About & Thought You Were Going To Love More But Didn’t?

Lost Lake by Sarah Addison Allen. I still enjoyed it but love her other books more.

  1. Most surprising (in a good way or bad way) book you read in 2014? 

The Inn at Lake Devine by Elinor Lipman. I don’t know how a book with such a modest story ended up being such a perfect read.

  1. Favorite new author you discovered in 2014?

I’ve been aware of her for a while, but I didn’t read Courtney Milan until this year and then I binged.

  1. Best book from a genre you don’t typically read/was out of your comfort zone?

The Happiness Project by Gretchen Rubin. I don’t read a lot of “self-help” type books (although, this is kind of self-help crossed with memoir / year-experiment book), but this one was very practical and had some insights that I’ve kept in mind since I read it.

  1. Most action-packed/thrilling/unputdownable book of the year?

Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer. Reading about doomed hikers on Everest is compelling, if tragic, reading.

  1. Favorite cover of a book you read in 2014?

David Mitchell’s The Bone Clocks. Great title, too.

Bone Clocks

  1. Most memorable character of 2014?

Tough call – I’ll pick one from a book I haven’t mentioned yet: thoroughly teenaged Bab from Bab: A Sub-Deb by Mary Roberts Rinehart.

  1. Most beautifully written book read in 2014?

Edward P. Jones’ All Aunt Hagar’s Children.

  1. Favorite Passage/Quote From A Book You Read In 2014?

“Religion is not about accepting twenty impossible propositions before breakfast, but about doing things that change you. It is a moral aesthetic, an ethical alchemy. If you behave in a certain way, you will be transformed.” – Karen Armstrong, The Spiral Staircase

16.Shortest & Longest Book You Read In 2013?

Shortest: The Governess Affair by Courtney Milan, 101 pages. (And my favorite of her books).

Longest: Parting the Waters, 924 pages.

Also, added for kicks:

Oldest: Wives and Daughters by Elizabeth Gaskell (1864)

Newest: The Bone Clocks (Sept. 2, 2014)

  1. Book That Shocked You The Most

(Because of a plot twist, character death, left you hanging with your mouth wide open, etc.)

Parting the Waters – it’s just one of many shocking injustices described in this book, but there’s an account that sticks in my mind – where an activist is pistol-whipped in the courthouse by a city official after trying to help a Mississippi black man register to vote.

  1. OTP OF THE YEAR (you will go down with this ship!)

(OTP = one true pairing if you aren’t familiar)

I know what this question is going for, but I’ll interpret this to mean my favorite romantic pairing in a book – I’ll go with Jenny and Gareth in Courtney Milan’s Proof by Seduction.

  1. Favorite Non-Romantic Relationship Of The Year

I loved the cross-class friendship (more of a friendly acquaintance, I guess) between Molly Gibson and Lady Harriet Cumnor in Wives and Daughters.

  1. Best Book You Read In 2014 That You Read Based SOLELY On A Recommendation From Somebody Else/Peer Pressure:

Most of the books I read come from recommendations of others, so I’ll go toward the peer pressure route and say Outlander by Diana Gabaldon. I’m not sure I’ll continue with the series, but it was a good read.

  1. Best Worldbuilding/Most Vivid Setting You Read This Year?

The village and homes of Gaskell’s Wives and Daughters.

  1. Book That Put A Smile On Your Face/Was The Most FUN To Read?

The Inn at Lake Devine, with Graeme Simsion’s The Rosie Project coming in second.

  1. Book That Made You Cry Or Nearly Cry in 2014?

I cried at the end of The Bone Clocks.

Questions added by me:

30. Roll Call of Notable Unfinished Books

There are some books not even worthy to mention in this roll call – I had very little expectations going in and they were discarded easily. These are the rest:

The Chaos / Sister Mine by Nalo Hopkinson – I really wanted to like these books, as she has been recommended on other blogs, and I’d enjoyed hearing the author speak a couple of years ago. However, I did not like the writing style at all, at least in these two books. I did not find the worldbuilding compelling, didn’t care for the characters, and especially in The Chaos, I found the dialogue forced and bizarre.

The Last Werewolf by Glen Duncan – I was kind of on a like-it-loathe-it pendulum while reading this book. Eventually I bored with it.

Anne of Avonlea by L.M. Montgomery – Ugh, those twins. I love you Anne, but even you’re not enough to compensate for all the plotlines involving that insidious child Davy.

  1. Best Dialogue in a Book?

Truman Capote’s Breakfast at Tiffany’s.

  1. Best Book that was adapted into film/tv?

Other than Wives and Daughters, I would say Piper Kerman’s Orange is the New Black.

 

For the comments, I’ll throw out some of these questions in particular: what was the best book you read in 2014? best dialogue (I love me some good dialogue)? Did you have any notable unfinished books?

8 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The Classics Club: 50 Questions

I just read JoAnn from Lakeside Musing’s post of answers to this survey, and felt like it would be worthwhile to do myself. It might also goad me into returning to the classics, as I haven’t read one since the summer. But winter is often a wonderful season for reading the classics!

1. Share a link to your club list.

Here it is: https://agoodstoppingpoint.wordpress.com/2012/11/10/joining-the-classics-club/

2. When did you join The Classics Club? How many titles have you read for the club? (We are SO CHECKING UP ON YOU! Nah. We’re just asking.) :)

I joined in November 2012 and have read 10 of the titles from my classics club list. I’ve read a few other classics outside of my offical list, namely some Golden Age mysteries, but didn’t end up counting them towards my goal. Regardless, it looks like I need to kick it up a notch on my classics reading.

3. What are you currently reading?

Not a classic – quite the opposite: I’m reading David Mitchell’s The Bone Clocks, which was released this year.

4. What did you just finish reading and what did you think of it?

Gretchen Rubin’s The Happiness Project (also not a classic). I loved it and felt inspired by it.

5. What are you reading next? Why?

I don’t know – perhaps Piper Kerman’s Orange is the New Black, because I have it on loan on my Kindle from the public library. Though answering this survey may shame me into reading a classic next instead.

6. Best book you’ve read so far with the club, and why?

Oh, tough call. Maybe A Tree Grows in Brooklyn by Betty Smith.

7. Book you most anticipate (or, anticipated) on your club list?

Patrick Leigh Fermor’s A Time of Gifts. A travel memoir classic I look forward to reading.

8. Book on your club list you’ve been avoiding, if any? Why?

Farewell to Arms by Ernest Hemingway. I tried reading it years ago, and didn’t finish, and I am wary of Hemingway in general.

9. First classic you ever read?

Pride and Prejudice. I joined a book club my freshman year of high school – a club that was mostly composed of teachers – and this was the first book we read.

10. Toughest classic you ever read?

Not including books assigned to me in school, I found Frankenstein slow-going. Not really tough, just not as engaging as I thought it would be.

11. Classic that inspired you? or scared you? made you cry? made you angry?

Lonesome Dove by Larry McMurtry. This one part where several characters are unexpectedly killed at once . . . man.

12. Longest classic you’ve read? Longest classic left on your club list?

David Copperfield by Charles Dickens – was not a fan at the time I read it, which was in 2004. The longest one left on the list is The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling by Henry Fielding.

13. Oldest classic you’ve read? Oldest classic left on your club list?

Not sure which is older – certain books of the Bible or the Epic of Gilgamesh, which I was assigned in high school. The oldest classic left on my club list is The Oresteia by Aeschylus, 458 B.C.

14. Favorite biography about a classic author you’ve read — or, the biography on a classic author you most want to read, if any?

I’m not very drawn to reading biographies, though I read part of a Frederick Douglass biography that was pretty interesting. I didn’t finish it before I had to return it to a public library in Illinois because I was moving back to the D.C. area. My uncle gave me a biography of Beatrix Potter that I’ve been meaning to read.

15. Which classic do you think EVERYONE should read? Why?

A Tree Grows in Brooklyn by Betty Smith. I just feel like it’s a pretty solid recommendation for almost anyone.

16. Favorite edition of a classic you own, if any?

I have pretty Penguin cloth-bound editions of Cranford, Pride & Prejudice and Middlemarch.

17. Favorite movie adaptation of a classic?

I really love the BBC miniseries version of Bleak House, the one with Gillian Anderson.

18. Classic which hasn’t been adapted yet (that you know of) which you very much wish would be adapted to film.

I was going to say The Talisman by Sir Walter Scott, because some parts of it were so cinematic in writing already, but wikipedia says it’s been source material for a number of films. Even Ridley Scott’s film Kingdom of Heaven drew some plot inspiration from The Talisman.

19. Least favorite classic? Why?

Not including books read for school, I really didn’t get on with David Copperfield, as mentioned above.

20. Name five authors you haven’t read yet whom you cannot wait to read.

Barbara Pym, Pearl Buck, Dorothy Whipple, Rumer Godden, Primo Levi.

21. Which title by one of the five you’ve listed above most excites you and why?

In this House of Brede by Rumer Godden. Can’t put my finger on it, but I really think it will be a rich and rewarding read.

22. Have you read a classic you disliked on first read that you tried again and respected, appreciated, or even ended up loving? (This could be with the club or before it.)

I think I found Sarah Orne Jewett’s The Country of Pointed Firs to be boring when I was in high school. I read it several years ago and thoroughly enjoyed the American “cozy” nature of it.

23. Which classic character can’t you get out of your head?

24. Which classic character most reminds you of yourself?

Don’t have answers for the above two questions.

25. Which classic character do you most wish you could be like?

Not in circumstances, but character: maybe Dorothea from Middlemarch.

26. Which classic character reminds you of your best friend?

Don’t really have an answer for this.

27. If a sudden announcement was made that 500 more pages had been discovered after the original “THE END” on a classic title you read and loved, which title would you most want to keep reading? Or, would you avoid the augmented manuscript in favor of the original? Why?

Most classics I’ve loved have had perfect endings, so I’ll cheat and say, Wives and Daughters. I wouldn’t want 500 more pages, but if it was discovered that after all, Elizabeth Gaskell had finished the book before she died, I would be very happy.

28. Favorite children’s classic?

Norton Juster’s The Phantom Tollbooth, perhaps. I should re-read that book.

29. Who recommended your first classic?

Part of that book club I mentioned earlier.

30. Whose advice do you always take when it comes to literature. (Recommends the right editions, suggests great titles, etc.)

Same answer as JoAnn – my blogging friends as a community.

31. Favorite memory with a classic?

Memorizing a passage of dialogue from Jane Eyre along with my younger sister and reciting it back and forth to each other as we walked to school, my senior year in high school.

32. Classic author you’ve read the most works by?

Jane Austen. I’ve read all of her full-length novels.

33. Classic author who has the most works on your club list?

Anthony Trollope, as I placed the last four of his Barchester Chronicles on the list.

34. Classic author you own the most books by?

William Faulkner. I took a class about him and Flannery O’Connor in college, and acquired a couple more titles by him after the class.

35. Classic title(s) that didn’t make it to your club list that you wish you’d included? (Or, since many people edit their lists as they go, which titles have you added since initially posting your club list?)

I’ve since added Lonesome Dove. I think The Forever War by Joe Haldeman was also added to the list since my initial posting.

36. If you could explore one author’s literary career from first publication to last — meaning you have never read this author and want to explore him or her by reading what s/he wrote in order of publication — who would you explore? Obviously this should be an author you haven’t yet read, since you can’t do this experiment on an author you’re already familiar with. :) Or, which author’s work you are familiar with might it have been fun to approach this way?

I already was planning to read Angela Thirkell’s Barsetshire novels in order, and that’s most of her output, so that may count. (I have read one of her novels – out of order – and realized that I should start at the beginning.)

37. How many rereads are on your club list? If none, why? If some, which are you most looking forward to, or did you most enjoy?

No re-reads on the list. I continually feel the pull of the books I haven’t read before.

38. Has there been a classic title you simply could not finish?

I’m sure that has been, but I can’t recall at the moment.

39. Has there been a classic title you expected to dislike and ended up loving?

I didn’t expect to dislike A Tree Grows in Brooklyn, but I think I was semi-bracing for it to be a sentimental sort of book and it definitely wasn’t. It was much more clear-eyed than I expected it to be.

40. Five things you’re looking forward to next year in classic literature?

Just reading more classics in general.

41. Classic you are DEFINITELY GOING TO MAKE HAPPEN next year?

Buddenbrooks. My cousin gave it to me with high praise. I need to give the library books a rest and read what’s on my own shelves.

42. Classic you are NOT GOING TO MAKE HAPPEN next year?

I’ll answer this practically: High Rising by Angela Thirkell because my plan is to read all of Trollope’s Barchester Chronicle books first.

43. Favorite thing about being a member of the Classics Club?

I don’t do every spin, but when I do, I like the suspense of it and I always make sure to visit other participating blogs during the spin and get reconnected to other club members.

44. List five fellow clubbers whose blogs you frequent. What makes you love their blogs?

It’s getting late, so I’ll skirt this question and just say there are a lot of blogs I enjoy reading and I don’t remember which ones – other than Lakeside Musing and The Bookworm Chronicles – participate in the Classics Club.

45. Favorite post you’ve read by a fellow clubber?

This would involve some research and rummaging on the internet, and the late hour bids me to wrap this post up.

46. If you’ve ever participated in a readalong on a classic, tell about the experience? If you’ve participated in more than one, what’s the very best experience? the best title you’ve completed? a fond memory? a good friend made?

I enjoyed reading Wilkie Collins’ The Woman in White with Reading Rambo, Devouring Texts, What Red Read, and others. Lots of snark and gifs abounded and we all loved the character of Marian.

47. If you could appeal for a readalong with others for any classic title, which title would you name? Why?

I missed the boat on an East of Eden readalong a couple of years ago and would do that or any one of the longer books.

48. How long have you been reading classic literature?

Since that Pride and Prejudice read, I guess, back when I was fourteen.

49. Share up to five posts you’ve written that tell a bit about your reading story. Reviews, journal entries, posts on novels you loved or didn’t love, lists, etc.

Aforementioned clock ticking and all that. Besides, I did something similar in my previous post about my five year blogging anniversary.

50. Question you wish was on this questionnaire? (Ask and answer it!)

Thing that has most surprised you about reading the classics?

How funny some of the classics authors can be! Humor is one of those things that I expect to be most vulnerable to the passage of time, but Dickens and even Victor Hugo have cracked me up before with passages of humor.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized